Legislature(1997 - 1998)
1997-04-03 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0934 HB 75 Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Grussendorf: Page 16, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 1,693,200 Insert 1,778,000 Under General Funds: Delete 1,119,000 Insert 1,189,800 Under Other Funds: Delete 574,200 Insert 588,200 Page 16, line 15: Under Allocations: Delete 505,700 Insert 590,500 Representative Grussendorf moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Barnes objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0935 HB 75 Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: James, Masek And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representative Nicholia: Page 24, line 22: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 2,197,300 Insert 2,312,300 Under General Funds: Delete 464,400 Insert 464,515 Page 24, line 23: Under Allocations: Delete 315,800 Insert 430,800 Representative Nicholia moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0936 HB 75 Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: James, Masek And so, Amendment No. 6 was not adopted. Amendment No. 7 was offered by Representative Kemplen: Page 27, line 14: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 48,748,700 Insert 50,748,700 Under General Funds: Delete 21,584,800 Insert 23,584,800 Page 27, line 23: Under Allocations: Delete 6,468,200 Insert 8,468,200 Representative Kemplen moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 7 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. Representative Barnes rose to a point of order, citing Section 121 of Mason's Manual. The Speaker stated that the point was well taken and cautioned the member to confine remarks to the amendment. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0937 HB 75 CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 7 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: James, Masek And so, Amendment No. 7 was not adopted. Amendment No. 8 was offered by Representative Nicholia: Page 17, line 25: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 25,355,600 Insert 26,063,100 Under General Funds: Delete 19,169,500 Insert 19,877,000 Page 17, line 26: Under Allocations: Delete 3,803,900 Insert 4,511,400 Representative Nicholia moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 8 be adopted. Representative Kohring objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0938 HB 75 CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Williams Excused: James, Masek Absent: Vezey And so, Amendment No. 8 was not adopted. Amendment No. 9 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 25, line 29: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 187,918,800 Insert 188,418,800 Under General Funds: Delete 93,285,600 Insert 93,785,600 Page 26, line 3: Under Allocations: Delete 541,900 Insert 1,041,900 Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 9 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0939 HB 75 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 9 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 9 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey Excused: James, Masek Absent: Joule, Williams And so, Amendment No. 9 was not adopted. Amendment No. 10 was offered by Representative Kemplen: Page 14, line 11: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 46,085,600 Insert 46,135,600 Under General Funds: Delete 38,125,800 Insert 38,175,800 Page 14, line 19: Under Allocations: Delete 4,346,600 Insert 4,396,600 Representative Kemplen moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 10 be adopted. 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0940 HB 75 Representative Davis objected. Representative Kubina placed a call of the House and lifted the call. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 10 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 10 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 6 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kubina, Moses Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault Excused: James, Masek Absent: Dyson, Kookesh, Nicholia, Ryan, Vezey, Williams And so, Amendment No. 10 was not adopted. Amendment No. 11 was offered by Representative Kemplen: Page 27, line 14: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 48,748,700 Insert 49,498,700 Under General Funds: Delete 21,584,800 Insert 22,334,800 Page 27, line 18: Under Allocations: Delete 22,093,100 Insert 22,843,100 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0941 HB 75 Representative Kemplen moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 11 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 11 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 11 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: James, Masek Absent: Hodgins, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 11 was not adopted. Amendment No. 12 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 22, line 28: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 34,416,700 Insert 34,877,000 Under General Funds: Delete 11,123,800 Insert 11,584,100 Page 23, line 9: Under Allocations: Delete 690,000 Insert 1,150,300 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0942 HB 75 Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 12 be adopted. Representative Therriault objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 12 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 12 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: James, Masek Absent: Sanders And so, Amendment No. 12 was not adopted. Amendment No. 13 was offered by Representative Grussendorf: Page 33, line 6: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 12,820,300 Insert 13,037,600 Under General Funds: Delete 12,150,900 Insert 12,368,200 Representative Grussendorf moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 13 be adopted. 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0943 HB 75 Representative Porter objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 13 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 13 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: James, Masek And so, Amendment No. 13 was not adopted. Amendment No. 14 was offered by Representative Joule: Page 20, line 29: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 67,841,800 Insert 68,234,000 Under General Funds: Delete 3,304,800 Insert 3,697,000 Page 20, line 32: Under Allocations: Delete 20,126,900 Insert 20,519,100 Representative Joule moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 14 be adopted. 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0944 HB 75 Representative Kelly objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 14 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 14 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: James, Masek Absent: Hanley And so, Amendment No. 14 was not adopted. Amendment No. 15 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 42, line 25: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 443,389,300 Insert 445,889,300 Under General Funds: Delete 164,762,600 Insert 167,262,600 Page 42, line 26: Under Allocations: Delete -19,980,700 Insert -17,480,700 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0945 HB 75 Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 15 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The following members moved and asked unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest: Representative Croft Representative Joule Representative Davies Objection was heard, and the members were required to vote. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 15 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 15 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: James, Masek And so, Amendment No. 15 was not adopted. Amendment No. 16 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 42, line 25: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 443,389,300 Insert 444,390,800 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0946 HB 75 Under General Funds: Delete 164,762,600 Insert 165,764,100 Page 42, line 28: Under Allocations: Delete 20,916,700 Insert 21,918,200 Page 42, following line 29: Insert It is the intent of the legislature that $1,001,500 in systemwide funding be used to maintain library resources and to meet new demands for library technology and distance delivery capabilities. Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 16 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 16 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 16 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Williams Excused: James, Masek Absent: Bunde, Therriault, Vezey And so, Amendment No. 16 was not adopted. 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0947 HB 75 Amendment No. 17 was offered by Representative Grussendorf: Page 32, line 22: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 13,861,000 Insert 13,908,800 Under General Funds: Delete 7,409,400 Insert 7,457,200 Page 32, line 26: Under Allocations: Delete 5,385,600 Insert 5,433,400 Representative Grussendorf moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 17 be adopted. Representative Therriault objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 17 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 17 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Therriault, Williams Excused: James, Masek Absent: Davies, Foster, Mulder, Sanders, Vezey And so, Amendment No. 17 was not adopted. 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0948 HB 75 Amendment No. 18 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 20, line 3: Under General Funds: Delete 9,709,700 Insert 10,709,700 Under Other Funds: Delete 1,000,000 Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 18 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. **The presence of Representative James was noted. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 18 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 18 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: Masek Absent: Davis, Kookesh And so, Amendment No. 18 was not adopted. Amendment No. 19 was offered by Representative Brice: 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0949 HB 75 Page 26, line 10: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 337,227,300 Insert 337,477,300 Under General Funds: Delete 96,814,900 Insert 97,064,900 Page 27, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete 9,221,700 Insert 9,471,700 Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 19 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 19 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 19 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: Masek Absent: Barnes, Hodgins, Ivan And so, Amendment No. 19 was not adopted. 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0950 HB 75 Amendment No. 20 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 32, line 22: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 13,861,000 Insert 13,936,000 Under General Funds: Delete 7,409,400 Insert 7,484,400 Page 32, line 29: Under Allocations: Delete 2,935,700 Insert 3,010,700 Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 20 be adopted. Representative Therriault objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 20 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 20 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: Masek Absent: Joule, Martin 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0951 HB 75 And so, Amendment No. 20 was not adopted. Amendment No. 21 was offered by Representative Elton: Page 22, line 28: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 34,416,700 Insert 34,499,200 Under General Funds: Delete 11,123,800 Insert 11,206,300 Page 23, line 5: Under Allocations: Delete 2,810,800 Insert 2,893,300 Representative Elton moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 21 be adopted. Representative Kohring objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 21 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 21 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Vezey Excused: Masek 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0952 HB 75 Absent: Dyson, Therriault, Williams And so, Amendment No. 21 was not adopted. Amendment No. 22 was offered by Representative Kemplen: Page 30, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 61,662,600 Insert 62,562,600 Under General Funds: Delete 22,815,900 Insert 23,715,900 Page 30, line 24: Under Allocations: Delete 2,735,900 Insert 3,635,900 Representative Kemplen moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 22 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 22 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 22 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0953 HB 75 Excused: Masek And so, Amendment No. 22 was not adopted. The Speaker stated that, without objection, the House would recess to 8:30 p.m.; and so, the House recessed at 6:24 p.m. HB 75 Amendment No. 23 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 28, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 26,468,500 Insert 27,154,500 Under General Funds: Delete 16,356,400 Insert 17,042,400 Page 28, line 22: Under Allocations: Delete 5,992,400 Insert 6,678,400 Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 23 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0954 HB 75 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 23 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 23 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Williams Excused: Masek Absent: Hudson, Moses, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey And so, Amendment No. 23 was not adopted. Amendment No. 24 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 34, line 18: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "33,308,500 Insert "33,411,400 Under General Funds: Delete "25,100,200 Insert "25,203,100 Page 34, line 19: Under Allocations: Delete "7,943,700 Insert "8,046,600 Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 24 be adopted. 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0955 HB 75 Representative Kelly objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 24 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 24 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Therriault, Williams Excused: Masek Absent: Hanley, Moses, Sanders, Vezey And so, Amendment No. 24 was not adopted. Amendment No. 25 was offered by Representative Nicholia: Page 36, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 7,011,000 Insert 7,261,000 Under General Funds: Delete 7,011,000 Insert 7,261,000 Page 36, line 15: Under Allocations: Delete 5,015,500 Insert 5,265,500 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0956 HB 75 Representative Nicholia moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 25 be adopted. Representative Davis objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 25 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 25 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Therriault, Williams Excused: Masek Absent: Moses, Sanders, Vezey And so, Amendment No. 25 was not adopted. Amendment No. 26 was offered by Representative Kemplen: Page 28, line 23: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 15,087,500 Insert 15,583,800 Under General Funds: Delete 14,616,200 Insert 15,112,500 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0957 HB 75 Page 28, line 24: Under Allocations: Delete 8,907,100 Insert 9,403,400 Representative Kemplen moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 26 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 26 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 26 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Therriault, Williams Excused: Masek Absent: Moses, Sanders, Vezey And so, Amendment No. 26 was not adopted. Amendment No. 27 was offered by Representative Joule: Page 21, line 25: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 20,266,300 Insert 20,539,500 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0958 HB 75 Under General Funds: Delete 4,228,000 Insert 4,501,200 Page 21, line 26: Under Allocations: Delete 11,349,100 Insert 11,622,300 Representative Joule moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 27 be adopted. Representative Kelly objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 27 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 27 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Therriault, Williams Excused: Masek Absent: Moses, Sanders, Vezey And so, Amendment No. 27 was not adopted. Amendment No. 28 was offered by Representatives Kookesh and Joule: 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0959 HB 75 Page 17, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 50,358,000 Insert 51,252,300 Under General Funds: Delete 50,358,000 Insert 51,252,300 Page 17, line 14: Under Allocations: Delete 22,719,800 Insert 23,614,100 Representative Kookesh moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 28 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. Amendment to Amendment No. 28 was offered by Representative Davies: Under Page 17, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 51,445,800 Insert 52,340,100 Under General Funds: Delete 51,445,800 Insert 52,340,100 Add: Page 17, line 15: Under Allocations: Delete 27,638,200 Insert 28,726,000 Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment to Amendment No. 28 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0960 HB 75 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 28 as amended be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 28 as amended YEAS: 11 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: Masek Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 28 as amended was not adopted. Amendment Nos. 29 and 30 were not offered. Amendment No. 31 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 44, line 3: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 48,853,600 Insert 50,285,400 Under General Funds: Delete 48,853,600 Insert 50,285,400 Page 44, line 6: Under Allocations: Delete 7,959,200 Insert 9,939,100 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0961 HB 75 Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 31 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 31 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 31 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: Masek Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 31 was not adopted. Amendment No. 32 was offered by Representative Elton: Page 30, line 30: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 3,205,600 Insert 3,355,600 Under General Funds: Delete 2,371,500 Insert 2,521,500 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0962 HB 75 Page 31, following line 4, insert a new line: Juneau Laboratory Under Allocations: Insert 150,000 Representative Elton moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 32 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 32 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 32 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: Masek Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 32 was not adopted. Amendment No. 33 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 27, line 25: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 16,499,300 Insert 16,799,300 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0963 HB 75 Under General Funds: Delete 5,919,400 Insert 6,219,400 Page 27, line 28: Under Allocations: Delete 13,182,400 Insert 13,482,400 Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 33 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 33 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 33 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: Masek Absent: Barnes, Kookesh, Moses And so, Amendment No. 33 was not adopted. Amendment No. 34 was offered by Representative Grussendorf: 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0964 HB 75 Page 37, line 21: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 29,738,200 Insert 29,847,800 Under Other Funds: Delete 29,738,200 Insert 29,847,000 Representative Grussendorf moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 34 be adopted. Representative Martin objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 34 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 34 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: Masek Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 34 was not adopted. Amendment No. 35 was offered by Representative Grussendorf: 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0965 HB 75 Page 38, line 20: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 4,776,500 Insert 4,869,500 Under Other Funds: Delete 4,776,500 Insert 4,869,500 Representative Grussendorf moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 35 be adopted. Representative Martin objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 35 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 35 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: Masek Absent: Hanley, Moses And so, Amendment No. 35 was not adopted. Amendment No. 36 was offered by Representative Davies: 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0966 HB 75 Page 34, line 32: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 8,562,300 Insert 8,737,700 Under General Funds: Delete 5,628,200 Insert 5,803,600 Page 35, line 3: Under Allocations: Delete 1,221,000 Insert 1,265,000 Page 35, line 5: Under Allocations: Delete 5,478,200 Insert 5,609,600 Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 36 be adopted. Representative Kelly objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 36 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 36 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: Masek 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0967 HB 75 Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 36 was not adopted. Amendment No. 37 was offered by Representative Joule: Page 17, line 16: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 5,880,200 Insert 5,880,425 Under General Funds: Delete 2,675,700 Insert 2,900,700 Page 17, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete 2,665,000 Insert 2,890,000 Representative Joule moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 37 be adopted. Representative Kohring objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 37 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 37 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0968 HB 75 Excused: Masek Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 37 was not adopted. Amendment No. 38 was offered by Representative Kemplen: Page 30, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 61,662,600 Insert 61,962,600 Under General Funds: Delete 22,815,900 Insert 23,115,900 Page 30, line 18: Under Allocations: Delete 1,127,000 Insert 1,427,000 Representative Kemplen moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 38 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. Representative Hodgins declared a conflict of interest. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 38 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 38 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Nicholia 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0969 HB 75 Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey Excused: Masek Absent: Kubina, Moses, Williams And so, Amendment No. 38 was not adopted. Amendment No. 39 was offered by Representative Joule: Page 20, line 29: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 67,841,800 Insert 68,053,100 Under General Funds: Delete 3,304,800 Insert 3,516,100 Page 20, line 30: Under Allocations: Delete 45,344,800 Insert 45,556,100 Representative Joule moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 39 be adopted. Representative Kelly objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 39 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 39 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0970 HB 75 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey Excused: Masek Absent: Barnes, Moses, Williams And so, Amendment No. 39 was not adopted. Amendment No. 40 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 22, line 28: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 34,416,700 Insert 34,466,700 Under General Funds: Delete 11,123,800 Insert 11,173,800 Page 22, line 29: Under Allocations: Delete 4,005,600 Insert 4,055,600 Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 40 be adopted. Representative Kohring objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 40 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0971 HB 75 CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 40 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: Masek Absent: Hanley, Moses And so, Amendment No. 40 was not adopted. Amendment No. 41 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 14, line 23: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 15,861,500 Insert 16,433,100 Under General Funds: Delete 15,790,800 Insert 16,362,400 Page 14, line 24: Under Allocations: Delete 6,975,600 Insert 7,547,200 Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 41 be adopted. 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0972 HB 75 Representative Davis objected. Amendment to Amendment No. 41 was offered by Representative Davies: Under Page 14, line 23: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 16,433,100 Insert 16,810,700 Under General Funds: Delete 16,362,400 Insert 16,740,000 Add: Page 14, line 25: Under Allocations: Delete 8,885,900 Insert 9,263,500 Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment to Amendment No. 41 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 41 as amended be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 41 as amended YEAS: 11 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: Masek 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0973 HB 75 Absent: Hanley, Moses And so, Amendment No. 41 as amended was not adopted. Amendment Nos. 42 and 43 were not offered. Amendment No. 44 was offered by Representative Grussendorf: Page 5, line 22: Delete 28,010,200 Insert 28,801,500 Page 42, line 8: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 76,793,000 Insert 77,493,300 Under Other Funds: Delete 76,793,000 Insert 77,493,300 Page 42, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete 2,013,600 Insert 2,167,500 Page 42, line 19: Under Allocations: Delete 53,104,400 Insert 53,555,944 Page 42, line 21: Under Allocations: Delete 10,055,100 Insert 10,149,600 Representative Grussendorf moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 44 be adopted. 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0974 HB 75 Objection was heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 44 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 44 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Excused: Masek Absent: Moses Kelly changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Therriault changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Williams changed from "Yea" to "Nay". And so, Amendment No. 44 was not adopted. Amendment No. 45 was offered by Representatives Foster and Ivan: Page 18, following line 9: Insert It is the intent of the legislature to appoint a task force consisting of consumers, utility and municipal officials and legislators to review and make recommendations regarding the power cost equalization program. The task force shall report back to the legislature no later than January 12, 1998. Representative Foster moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 45 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 1997-04-03 House Journal Page 0975 HB 75 Representative Porter moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 75(FIN) am be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Representative Kubina objected. The Speaker stated that CSHB 75(FIN) am will be in third reading on the April 4, 1997, calendar.